Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.409
Filtrar
1.
J Behav Med ; 47(3): 446-457, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581595

RESUMO

Awareness and uptake of the meningitis vaccine remains low among marginalized groups, such as Latino men who have sex with men (LMSM), potentially due to structural and psychosocial barriers in accessing preventative healthcare. The current study explored awareness and uptake of meningitis vaccines among a group of LMSM (N = 99) living in South Florida. A three-pronged variable selection approach was utilized prior to conducting regression models (linear and logistic). Overall, 48.5% of the participants reported little to no knowledge about meningitis vaccines, and 20.2% reported being vaccinated. Living with HIV (OR = 10.48) and time since outbreak (OR = 1.03) were significant predictors of meningitis vaccine uptake. No significant correlates of meningitis vaccine awareness were identified. More research is needed to identify other important factors associated with meningitis vaccine awareness and uptake among LMSM, a multiple marginalized group.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Meningite , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Humanos , Masculino , Surtos de Doenças , Florida , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Meningite/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2333106, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566502

RESUMO

Vaccine co-administration is a useful strategy for improving vaccine coverage and adherence. In Italy, an update to the national immunization program (NIP) in 2023 included recommendations for co-administration of pediatric vaccines, including the four-component vaccine for meningococcus B (4CMenB), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), hexavalent vaccines, and oral rotavirus vaccines. Safety is a major concern when considering vaccine co-administration; therefore, a literature review of the available evidence on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines was performed. Of 763 publications screened, two studies were reviewed that reported safety data on 4CMenB co-administration with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines in infants aged 0-24 months. Overall, these studies supported that there were no significant safety signals when co-administering 4CMenB with PCV, hexavalent/pentavalent, and rotavirus vaccines, compared with individual vaccination. This review provides key insights for healthcare professionals on the tolerability of co-administering 4CMenB with routine vaccines.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinação , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Recém-Nascido , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem
3.
Patient ; 17(3): 319-333, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research is fundamental for designing discrete choice experiments (DCEs) but is often underreported in the preference literature. We developed a DCE to elicit preferences for vaccination against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) among adolescents and young people (AYP) and parents and legal guardians (PLG) in the United States. This article reports the targeted literature review and qualitative interviews that informed the DCE design and demonstrates how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies. METHODS: This study included two parts: a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews. The Medline and Embase databases were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies on IMD and immunization. The results of the targeted literature review informed a qualitative interview guide. Sixty-minute, online, semi-structured interviews with AYP and PLG were used to identify themes related to willingness to be vaccinated against IMD. Participants were recruited through a third-party recruiter's database and commercial online panels. Interviews included vignettes about IMD and vaccinations and three thresholding exercises examining the effect of incidence rate, disability rate, and fatality rate on vaccination preferences. Participant responses related to the themes were counted. RESULTS: The targeted literature review identified 31 concepts that were synthesized into six topics for the qualitative interviews. Twenty AYP aged 16-23 years and 20 PLG of adolescents aged 11-17 years were interviewed. Four themes related to willingness to be vaccinated emerged: attitudes towards vaccination, knowledge and information, perception of IMD, and vaccine attributes. Most participants were concerned about IMD (AYP 60%; PLG 85%) and had positive views of vaccination (AYP 80%; PLG 60%). Ninety percent of AYP and 75% of PLG always chose vaccination over no vaccination, independent of IMD incidence rate, disability rate, or fatality rate. CONCLUSION: Willingness to be vaccinated against IMD was affected by vaccine attributes but largely insensitive to IMD incidence and severity. This article provides an example of how to apply the recent reporting guidelines for qualitative developmental work in preference studies, with 21 out of 22 items in the guidelines being considered.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Preferência do Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Entrevistas como Assunto , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Comportamento de Escolha , Pais/psicologia , Criança , Vacinação
4.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 40(1): 125-140, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032143

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and young adults 16-23-years-old under shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, MenB vaccination coverage in this population remains low in the United States (US). We investigated the awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding MenB disease and vaccination among parents of 16-18-year-old older adolescents and among 19-23-year-old young adults. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in September-October 2022 among parents of older adolescents and among young adults recruited from a US-based patient panel. RESULTS: There were 606 total participants, including parents of MenB-vaccinated (n = 151) and non-vaccinated (n = 154) adolescents, and also MenB-vaccinated (n = 150) and non-vaccinated (n = 151) young adults. Non-vaccinated cohorts reported low awareness of MenB disease (58.3-67.5%) and vaccination (49.7-61.0%), though awareness was higher among non-vaccinated parents. However, all cohorts reported high interest in learning more about MenB disease and vaccination. Vaccinated cohorts relied on primary care providers (PCPs) to initiate MenB vaccination conversation and had a low awareness of SCDM at 35.1-45.3%, though those aware of SCDM were more likely to participate in decision-making. Barriers to MenB vaccination included lack of PCP recommendation, vaccine side effects, and uncertainty about vaccination need. CONCLUSIONS: There are gaps in awareness of MenB disease, vaccination, and SCDM among parents and patients in the US, resulting in missed opportunities for discussing and administering MenB vaccination. Targeted education on MenB and vaccination recommendations may increase these opportunities and improve MenB vaccination awareness and initiation.


MenB disease, a type of meningitis, is a serious and life-threatening illness. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that 16­23-year-olds get a MenB vaccine after talking with their healthcare provider and deciding it is the right choice. As of 2021, only about 3 in 10 17-year-olds had received a MenB vaccine. In this study, we used an online survey to learn about parents of older teens' (16­18-years-old) and young adults' (19­23-years-old) awareness, thoughts, and practices related to meningitis and the MenB vaccine. Parents of non-vaccinated teens, and non-vaccinated young adults, had a lower awareness of the causes, risks, and symptoms of meningitis, and the MenB vaccine. In addition, most parents thought the impact of meningitis would be severe, compared with young adults who thought it would be less severe. Most participants were also not aware of their role in deciding if they or their child should be vaccinated against MenB. However, most showed a high interest in learning more about meningitis and the MenB vaccine. We also found that most teens and young adults who did receive the MenB vaccine received it right after talking about it with their healthcare provider. These findings show a clear opportunity to address gaps in awareness and thoughts about meningitis and MenB vaccination. Providing education and resources to parents, young adults, and healthcare providers could create more opportunities to discuss MenB vaccination and lead to more teens and young adults accessing vaccination and being protected against meningitis.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Meningite Meningocócica , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Pais , Vacinação , Adolescente , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B , Pais/psicologia , Sorogrupo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/psicologia , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle
5.
Vaccine ; 41(31): 4579-4585, 2023 07 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336662

RESUMO

The spleen is responsible for blood filtration and mounting an immune response against pathogens. In some people the spleen must be surgically removed because of traumatic events or oncological and hematological conditions. These patients are at higher risk of developing diseases caused by encapsulated bacteria throughout their lives. Thus, immunisations are advised for splenectomised persons to prevent infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). This study assessed vaccination coverage (VC) among Norwegian patients with surgical asplenia. Using the Nomesco Classification of Surgical Procedures codes, patient information (age, sex, date of initial diagnosis and date of surgery) was acquired from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The National Immunization Register provided information on vaccination status and data of any subsequent invasive bacterial infections were obtained from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases. From the total population of Norway, 3155 patients who had undergone complete splenectomy were identified. Of these, 914 (29.0%) had received at least one dose of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), 1324 (42.0%) at least one dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and 589 (18.7%) had received both. Only 4.2% of the patients had received two doses of a meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine, while 8.0% of 1467 patients splenectomised after 2014 had received at least two doses of a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine. The VC for Hib was 18.7%. Nearly all splenectomised children under the age of 10 were vaccinated with Hib and PCV as these vaccines are included in the childhood immunisation program. For all vaccines, VC decreased with age. Twenty-nine invasive bacterial infections were registered post-splenectomy in 25 patients. Vaccination according to national recommendations could have prevented at least 8 (28%) of these infections. Our study showed that efforts are required to increase VC of splenectomised individuals in Norway.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Esplenectomia , Criança , Humanos , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Noruega/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Esplenectomia/efeitos adversos , Vacinação , Vacinas Conjugadas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Cobertura Vacinal
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e98, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37259803

RESUMO

Country-wide social distancing and suspension of non-emergency medical care due to the COVID-19 pandemic will undoubtedly have affected public health in multiple ways. While non-pharmaceutical interventions are expected to reduce the transmission of several infectious diseases, severe disruptions to healthcare systems have hampered diagnosis, treatment, and routine vaccination. We examined the effect of this disruption on meningococcal disease and vaccination in the UK. By adapting an existing mathematical model for meningococcal carriage, we addressed the following questions: What is the predicted impact of the existing MenACWY adolescent vaccination programme? What effect might social distancing and reduced vaccine uptake both have on future epidemiology? Will catch-up vaccination campaigns be necessary? Our model indicated that the MenACWY vaccine programme was generating substantial indirect protection and suppressing transmission by 2020. COVID-19 social distancing is expected to have accelerated this decline, causing significant long-lasting reductions in both carriage prevalence of meningococcal A/C/W/Y strains and incidence of invasive meningococcal disease. In all scenarios modelled, pandemic social mixing effects outweighed potential reductions in vaccine uptake, causing an overall decline in carriage prevalence from 2020 for at least 5 years. Model outputs show strong consistency with recently published case data for England.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis , Adolescente , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Inglaterra , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Pandemias , Vacinação , Vacinas Combinadas , Vacinas Conjugadas
7.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 933, 2023 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) have suboptimal uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal vaccines. This study examines barriers and facilitators to HPV and meningococcal vaccination among MSM in a large, racially/ethnically diverse, and medically underserved U.S. region. METHODS: In 2020, we conducted five focus groups with MSM living in the Inland Empire, California. Participants discussed (1) their knowledge about and attitudes toward HPV, meningococcal disease, and related vaccines; and (2) factors that would encourage or discourage vaccine uptake. Data were systematically analyzed to identify salient barriers and facilitators to vaccination. RESULTS: Participants (N = 25) had a median age of 29. Most were Hispanic (68%), self-identified as gay (84%), and had college degrees (64%). Key barriers to vaccination included: (1) limited awareness and knowledge about HPV and meningococcal disease, (2) reliance on mainstream healthcare providers for vaccine information, (3) stigma and reluctance to disclose sexual orientation, (4) uncertainty about health insurance coverage and vaccine costs, and (5) distance and time required to access vaccines. Key facilitators to vaccination were: (1) vaccine confidence, (2) perceived severity of HPV and meningococcal disease, (3) bundling vaccination into routine healthcare, and (4) pharmacies as vaccination sites. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight opportunities for HPV and meningococcal vaccine promotion, including targeted education and awareness campaigns for MSM, LGBT inclusivity training for healthcare providers, and structural interventions to improve vaccine accessibility.


Assuntos
Homossexualidade Masculina , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Masculino , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Grupos Focais , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Estigma Social , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seguro Saúde
8.
N Engl J Med ; 388(21): 1942-1955, 2023 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37224196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An effective, affordable, multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine is needed to prevent epidemic meningitis in the African meningitis belt. Data on the safety and immunogenicity of NmCV-5, a pentavalent vaccine targeting the A, C, W, Y, and X serogroups, have been limited. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, noninferiority trial involving healthy 2-to-29-year-olds in Mali and Gambia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular dose of NmCV-5 or the quadrivalent vaccine MenACWY-D. Immunogenicity was assessed at day 28. The noninferiority of NmCV-5 to MenACWY-D was assessed on the basis of the difference in the percentage of participants with a seroresponse (defined as prespecified changes in titer; margin, lower limit of the 96% confidence interval [CI] above -10 percentage points) or geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios (margin, lower limit of the 98.98% CI >0.5). Serogroup X responses in the NmCV-5 group were compared with the lowest response among the MenACWY-D serogroups. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1800 participants received NmCV-5 or MenACWY-D. In the NmCV-5 group, the percentage of participants with a seroresponse ranged from 70.5% (95% CI, 67.8 to 73.2) for serogroup A to 98.5% (95% CI, 97.6 to 99.2) for serogroup W; the percentage with a serogroup X response was 97.2% (95% CI, 96.0 to 98.1). The overall difference between the two vaccines in seroresponse for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.2 percentage points (96% CI, -0.3 to 3.1) for serogroup W to 20.5 percentage points (96% CI, 15.4 to 25.6) for serogroup A. The overall GMT ratios for the four shared serogroups ranged from 1.7 (98.98% CI, 1.5 to 1.9) for serogroup A to 2.8 (98.98% CI, 2.3 to 3.5) for serogroup C. The serogroup X component of the NmCV-5 vaccine generated seroresponses and GMTs that met the prespecified noninferiority criteria. The incidence of systemic adverse events was similar in the two groups (11.1% in the NmCV-5 group and 9.2% in the MenACWY-D group). CONCLUSIONS: For all four serotypes in common with the MenACWY-D vaccine, the NmCV-5 vaccine elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those elicited by the MenACWY-D vaccine. NmCV-5 also elicited immune responses to serogroup X. No safety concerns were evident. (Funded by the U.K. Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03964012.).


Assuntos
Epidemias , Nível de Saúde , Meningite , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Vacinas Conjugadas , Humanos , Gâmbia/epidemiologia , Mali/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Injeções Intramusculares , Meningite/epidemiologia , Meningite/prevenção & controle , Epidemias/prevenção & controle
9.
Vaccine ; 40(32): 4453-4463, 2022 07 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35697571

RESUMO

The clinical development of the meningococcal vaccine, 4CMenB, included 2 doses in vaccine-naïve adolescents, which was considered unlikely to be cost-effective for implementation. Theoretically, priming with 4CMenB in early childhood might drive strong immune responses after only a single booster dose in adolescents and reduce programmatic costs. To address this question, children over 11 years old who took part in previous trials involving the administration of 3-5 doses of 4CMenB at infant/preschool age from 2006 were recruited into a post licensure single-centre trial, and were divided into two groups: those who received their last dose at 12 months old (infant group) and those who received their last dose at 3 years old (infant + preschool group). Naïve age-matched controls were randomised to receive one (adolescent 1 group) or two doses at days 0 and 28 (adolescent 2 group) of 4CMenB. Serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays using human complement were performed against three reference strains prior to vaccination, and at 1, 6 and 12 months. Previous vaccination was associated with a higher response to a single booster dose at 11 years of age, one-month post-vaccination, when compared with a single dose in naïve age-matched controls. At day 180, the highest responses were observed in participants in the infant + preschool group against strain 5/99 (GMT 316.1 [CI 158.4 to 630.8]), as compared with naïve adolescents who received two doses (GMTs 84.5 [CI 57.7 to 123.6]). When the last dose was received at 12-months of age, responses to a single adolescent dose were not as robust (GMT 61.1 [CI 14.8 to 252.4] to strain 5/99). This descriptive study indicates that the highest SBA responses after a single dose in adolescence were observed in participants who received a preschool dose, suggesting that B cell memory responses are not sufficiently primed at less than 12 months of age. Trial registration EudraCT 2017-004732-11, ISRCTN16774163.


Assuntos
Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Vacinação
10.
Front Immunol ; 13: 814088, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35126397

RESUMO

The identification of an appropriate animal model for use in the development of meningococcal vaccines has been a challenge as humans are the only natural host for Neisseria meningitidis. Small animal models have been developed and are widely used to study the efficacy or immunogenicity of vaccine formulations generated against various diseases. Here, we describe the development and optimization of a mouse model for assessing the immunogenicity of candidate tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide (MenACYW-TT) protein conjugate vaccines. Three inbred (BALB/c [H-2d], C3H/HeN [H-2k], or C57BL/6 [H-2b]) and one outbred (ICR [H-2g7]) mouse strains were assessed using serial two-fold dose dilutions (from 2 µg to 0.03125 µg per dose of polysaccharide for each serogroup) of candidate meningococcal conjugate vaccines. Groups of 10 mice received two doses of the candidate vaccine 14 days apart with serum samples obtained 14 days after the last dose for the evaluation of serogroup-specific anti-polysaccharide IgG by ELISA and bactericidal antibody by serum bactericidal assay (SBA). C3H/HeN and ICR mice had a more dose-dependent antibody response to all four serogroups than BALB/c and C57Bl/6 mice. In general, ICR mice had the greatest antibody dose-response range (both anti-polysaccharide IgG and bactericidal antibodies) to all four serogroups and were chosen as the model of choice. The 0.25 µg per serogroup dose was chosen as optimal since this was in the dynamic range of the serogroup-specific dose-response curves in most of the mouse strains evaluated. We demonstrate that the optimized mouse immunogenicity model is sufficiently sensitive to differentiate between conjugated polysaccharides, against unconjugated free polysaccharides and, to degradation of the vaccine formulations. Following optimization, this optimized mouse immunogenicity model has been used to assess the impact of different conjugation chemistries on immunogenicity, and to screen and stratify various candidate meningococcal conjugate vaccines to identify those with the most desirable profile to progress to clinical trials.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Animais , Feminino , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Infecções Meningocócicas/veterinária , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Camundongos Endogâmicos C3H , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Endogâmicos ICR , Modelos Animais , Sorogrupo , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia
11.
Vaccine ; 40(9): 1246-1252, 2022 02 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35125221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Between May 2005 and March 2007, three vaccines were recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine use in adolescents in the United States: quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY), tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). Understanding historical adolescent vaccination patterns may inform future vaccination coverage efforts for these and emerging adolescent vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: This was a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. All vaccines administered to adolescents aged 11 through 18 years in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 were examined. Vaccination coverage was assessed by study year for ≥1 dose Tdap or Td, ≥1 dose Tdap, ≥1 dose MenACWY, ≥1 dose HPV, and ≥3 dose HPV. The proportion of vaccine visits with concurrent vaccination (≥2 vaccines administered at the same visit) was calculated by sex and study year. The most common vaccine combinations administered in the study population were described by sex for two time periods: 2007-2010 and 2011-2016. RESULTS: The number of 11-18-year-olds in the study population averaged 522,565 males and 503,112 females per study year. Between January 2007 and December 2016 there were 4,884,553 vaccine visits in this population (45% among males). The overall proportion of concurrent vaccine visits among males was 43% (33-61% by study year). Among females, 39% of all vaccine visits included concurrent vaccination (32-48% by study year). Vaccine coverage for Tdap, MenACWY, and 1- and 3-dose HPV increased across the study period. A wide variety of vaccine combinations were administered among both sexes and in both time periods. CONCLUSIONS: The high vaccine uptake and multitude of vaccine combinations administered concurrently in the adolescent population of the Vaccine Safety Datalink provide historical patterns with which to compare future adolescent vaccination campaigns.


Assuntos
Vacinação , Vacinas , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/tendências , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas/efeitos adversos
12.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 6(2): 96-105, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34883094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In August, 2015, the UK implemented an emergency adolescent immunisation programme with the meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine to combat a national outbreak of meningococcal group W (MenW) disease due to a hypervirulent ST-11 complex strain, which is currently causing regional and national outbreaks worldwide. This immunisation programme specifically targeted adolescents aged 13-18 years, an age group with low disease incidence but high nasopharyngeal carriage, with the aim of interrupting transmission and providing indirect (herd) protection across the population. Here, we report the impact of the first 4 years of the programme in England. METHODS: Public Health England conducts meningococcal disease surveillance in England. Laboratory-confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease during the academic years 2010-11 to 2014-15 (Sept 1 to Aug 31) were used to predict post-vaccination trends, based on the assumption that cases would plateau 1 year after vaccine implementation (conservative scenario) or that cases would continue to rise for 4 years after vaccine implementation (extreme scenario). Vaccine uptake evaluated in August, 2019, was 37-41% in adolescents aged 18 years immunised in primary care and 71-86% in younger teenagers routinely vaccinated in school. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with the indirect screening method. FINDINGS: MenW and MenY cases plateaued within 12 months and then declined, while MenC cases remained low throughout. Significant reductions were observed among adolescents aged 14-18 years for MenW (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·35 [95% CI 0·17-0·76]) and MenY (0·21 [0·07-0·59]) cases, with a non-significant reduction in MenC cases (0·11 [0·01-1·01]). Based on conservative and extreme scenarios, 205-1193 MenW cases were prevented through the indirect effects of the programme and 25 through direct protection. For MenY, an estimated 60-106 cases were prevented through the indirect effects of the programme and 19 through direct protection. Ignoring any residual effect from an earlier MenC-containing vaccine, the overall vaccine effectiveness against MenCWY disease combined was 94% (95% CI 80-99). INTERPRETATION: A meningococcal immunisation programme specifically targeting adolescent carriers succeeded in rapidly controlling a national MenW outbreak, even with moderate initial vaccine uptake. FUNDING: Public Health England.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo W-135/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Adolescente , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Sorogrupo , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
13.
mSphere ; 6(6): e0055321, 2021 12 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34787449

RESUMO

This phase 2, randomized, open-label study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational meningococcal ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) that contains components of licensed vaccines against meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) and serogroups ACWY (MenACWY). A total of 500 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomly assigned to one of five study groups in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio. Four groups received two doses 2 months apart of MenABCWY and 4CMenB plus MenACWY administered concomitantly in the same arm (4CMenB+ACWY/S group) or different arms (4CMenB+ACWY/D group) or 4CMenB administered alone. A fifth group received a single MenACWY dose. Immunogenicity was determined by serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA). The study was powered to assess immunological interference against pooled serogroup B test strains. One month after the second vaccine dose, hSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) (with 80% confidence intervals [CI]) against pooled serogroup B strains were 31.84 (80% CI, 28.18 to 35.98), 38.48 (80% CI, 34.23 to 43.26), 40.08 (80% CI, 35.44 to 45.33), and 42.38 (80% CI, 37.31 to 48.13) in the MenABCWY, 4CMenB+ACWY/S, 4CMenB+ACWY/D, and 4CMenB groups, respectively. Immune responses (GMTs and 80% CIs) were lower for PorA and NHBA serogroup B test strains in the MenABCWY group compared to the 4CMenB+ACWY/D group and 4CMenB group. Evaluation of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) identified no safety concerns for the MenABCWY vaccine. One serious AE (syncope in the 4CMenB group) was considered related to vaccination. In conclusion, there is no evidence of substantial immunological interference between 4CMenB and MenACWY vaccine components against serogroup B. The safety and tolerability profile of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine was acceptable. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03587207.) IMPORTANCE The bacterial species Neisseria meningitidis is a major cause of meningitis, with six meningococcal groups (serogroups) causing most cases. A licensed vaccine, MenACWY (Menveo), targets four of these meningococcal serogroups, and another vaccine, 4CMenB (Bexsero), targets serogroup B. A combined vaccine (MenABCWY) that targets all five serogroups is under development to simplify the vaccination schedule. In a previous study, the immune response to serogroup B was found to be overall higher in individuals who received 4CMenB than in those who received an investigational MenABCWY vaccine. We investigated this further by giving healthy adolescents and young adults the MenABCWY vaccine, 4CMenB plus MenACWY vaccine in the same or different arms, 4CMenB vaccine alone, or MenACWY vaccine alone. Immunogenicity results for serogroup B across study groups suggest no major interference between the MenB and MenACWY vaccine components. This supports further development of the combined MenABCWY vaccine.


Assuntos
Drogas em Investigação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Adolescente , Atividade Bactericida do Sangue , Criança , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Drogas em Investigação/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Sorogrupo , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(35): 1183-1190, 2021 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473682

RESUMO

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that adolescents aged 11-12 years routinely receive tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY); and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Catch-up vaccination is recommended for hepatitis B (HepB); hepatitis A (HepA); measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); and varicella (VAR) vaccines for adolescents whose childhood vaccinations are not current. Adolescents are also recommended to receive a booster dose of MenACWY vaccine at age 16 years, and shared clinical decision-making is recommended for the serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (MenB) for persons aged 16-23 years (1). To estimate coverage with recommended vaccines, CDC analyzed data from the 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) for 20,163 adolescents aged 13-17 years.* Coverage with ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine increased from 71.5% in 2019 to 75.1% in 2020. The percentage of adolescents who were up to date† with HPV vaccination (HPV UTD) increased from 54.2% in 2019 to 58.6% in 2020. Coverage with ≥1 dose of Tdap, ≥1 dose (and among adolescents aged 17 years, ≥2 doses) of MenACWY remained similar to coverage in 2019 (90.1%, 89.3%, and 54.4% respectively). Coverage increased for ≥2 doses of HepA among adolescents aged 13-17 years and ≥1 dose of MenB among adolescents aged 17 years. Adolescents living below the federal poverty level§ had higher HPV vaccination coverage than adolescents living at or above the poverty level. Adolescents living outside a metropolitan statistical area (MSA)¶ had lower coverage with ≥1 MenACWY and ≥1 HPV dose, and a lower proportion being HPV UTD than adolescents in MSA principal cities. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine immunization services. Results from the 2020 NIS-Teen reflect adolescent vaccination coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2020 NIS-Teen data could be used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on catch-up vaccination but not on routine adolescent vaccination because adolescents included in the survey were aged ≥13 years, past the age when most routine adolescent vaccines are recommended, and most vaccinations occurred before March 2020. Continued efforts to reach adolescents whose routine medical care has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic are necessary to protect persons and communities from vaccine-preventable diseases and outbreaks.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Comitês Consultivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem
16.
Pan Afr Med J ; 39: 57, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34422180

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Neisseria meningitides is the leading cause of meningitis in the African Meningitis Belt. The objective of this study was to conduct a trend analysis of the burden of meningococcal meningitis in the African Meningitis Belt countries from 2009 to 2014. METHODS: secondary data on incidence and death cases were collected from the World Health Organization (WHO) and analyzed to determine the trends of meningitis in the African Meningitis Belt countries using Microsoft excel and Stata 14. RESULTS: these data show unstable meningococcal meningitis outbreaks in the Meningitis Belt before and after the introduction of meningococcal A vaccine (MenAfriVac). The vaccine was introduced at different times in the different countries. E.g. it was introduced in 2010 across Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger while it was introduced from 2011 to 2016 in other countries through mass campaigns. Ever since the vaccine was introduced, there has been a decrease in the number of cases in the countries hence a reduction in the burden of the disease. CONCLUSION: after the introduction of the MenAfriVac, there has been a decline in the meningitis cases in Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Ghana, Niger and Nigeria while Sudan shows a decrease only in 2014.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Meningite Meningocócica/epidemiologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis/isolamento & purificação , África/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Incidência , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle
18.
Western Pac Surveill Response J ; 12(1): 26-31, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34094620

RESUMO

PROBLEM: From December 2016 to February 2017, two cases of invasive meningococcal disease and one case of meningococcal conjunctivitis, all serogroup W, occurred in Aboriginal children in the Ceduna region of South Australia. The clustering of cases in time and place met the threshold for a community outbreak. CONTEXT: The Ceduna region is a remote part of South Australia, with more than 25% of the population identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. ACTION: As part of the outbreak response, a community-wide meningococcal vaccination programme against serogroups A, C, W and Y was implemented in a collaboration among different agencies of the South Australia Department for Health and Well-being, Aboriginal health and community services providers, and other local service providers and government agencies. The programme comprised an outbreak vaccination schedule, targeting all people aged 3 2 months residing in the cases' places of residence or in towns with close links. OUTCOME: Between March and June 2017, 3383 persons were vaccinated, achieving an estimated coverage of 71-85% of the target population, with 31% (n = 1034) of those vaccinated identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. No local cases of serogroup W occurred during the vaccination programme, but two further cases were notified by the end of 2018. DISCUSSION: The participation of a large number of local and non-health-sector stakeholders in programme planning and implementation, a clear response management structure and high community acceptability were identified as key factors that contributed to the programme achieving high vaccination coverage. The need to develop standard operating procedures for community-based outbreak response interventions to ease logistical challenges was considered an important lesson learnt.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Infecções Meningocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Neisseria meningitidis/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Masculino , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neisseria meningitidis/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Sorogrupo , Austrália do Sul/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 232, 2021 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The internet has made significant contributions towards health education. Analyzing the pattern of online behavior regarding meningitis and vaccinations may be worthwhile. It is hypothesized that the online search patterns in meningitis are correlated with its number of cases and the search patterns of its related vaccines. METHODS: This was an infodemiological study that determined the relationship among online search interest in meningitis, its worldwide number of cases and its associated vaccines. Using Google Trends™ Search Volume Indices (SVIs), we evaluated the search queries "meningitis," "pneumococcal vaccine," "BCG vaccine," "meningococcal vaccine" and "influenza vaccine" in January 2021, covering January 2008 to December 2020. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine correlations between these queries. RESULTS: The worldwide search interest in meningitis from 2008 to 2020 showed an average SVI of 46 ± 8.8. The most searched topics were symptoms, vaccines, and infectious agents with SVIs of 100, 52, and 39, respectively. The top three countries with the highest search interest were Ghana, Kazakhstan, and Kenya. There were weak, but statistically significant correlations between meningitis and the BCG (ρ = 0.369, p < 0.001) and meningococcal (ρ = 0.183, p < 0.05) vaccines. There were no statistically significant associations between the number of cases, influenza vaccine, and pneumococcal vaccine. CONCLUSION: The relationships among the Google SVIs for meningitis and its related vaccines and number of cases data were inconsistent and remained unclear. Future infodemiological studies may expand their scopes to social media, semantics, and big data for more robust conclusions.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviços de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Meningite/patologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Serviços de Informação/tendências , Masculino , Meningite/epidemiologia , Meningite/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...